Previously I posted the open letter to the Human Rights Commission asking them to do more for men, but they have not responded even though I did send them a reminder. So I have started a video series highlighting their human rights violations. Here is part one.
There are likely many Covid-19 tragedies so far untold, with people accepting their position in the belief that their circumstance was unavoidable until we have a unique tragedy that actually makes us all sit up and realistically analyse such questions.
It’s not the first time that an event like this has begged an answer.
I’m separated for almost 3 years. There are two children who spend 5 nights every fortnight with me. their mother and I have a toxic relationship. We are attending FDR and still going through family court.
Against my wishes, my daughter was given an iPhone 12 a year ago by her mother, she was 12 years old then. (more…)
This video clip labels feminism as a hate group. It compares white America 60 years ago.
Its not about what they feel and think, it’s about what they do.
1. Advocates lesser rights in law for the target group.
2. Propagates discrimination against the target group.
3. Teaches that the target group is inherently inferior.
4. Teaches that the target group is a threat.
5. Use lies including historical revisionism to spread these views.
6. Tolerates violence towards the target group.
If you change the words “Target Group” to men, boys or fathers. The picture becomes easier to see.
1. Advocates lesser rights in law for men, boys or fathers.
2. Propagates discrimination against men, boys or fathers.
3. Teaches that the men, boys or fathers are inherently inferior.
4. Teaches that the men, boys or fathers are a threat.
5. Use lies, including historical revisionism to spread these views.
6. Tolerates violence towards men, boys or fathers.
There are moves to punish hate speech. But in my view it is more than hate speech. It has to be hate actions and hate laws. Discrimination against men, fathers and boys.
I have not had much time to read this, but I do know the terms “without notice application” features 66 times. And that process has been used to stop or limit dads child contact.
While there is mention of the length of time, one being over three years, there is no mention of alienation. Which, that along with having an order for dwelling and all the things in it vested into one parent, is the true reason why without notice applications are applied for.
In more simple terms,
1. “the destruction of a dads relationship with his child.”
2. “the kicking out of his home”
3. “the taking away of all the items in that home”
Where do fathers and men go, what are they supposed to do when this happens to them?
According to the Nurit Thesis, this causes male suicide.
Former frontline Police Officer Evelyn Rae, 12 years of service, tells all in a recent interview with Bettina Arndt.
Says 75% of woman allegations of domestic violence are false.
Says in all her years can honestly say just 3 legitimate cases of sexual assault, everything else was false allegation or no evidence. Says this is the hard truth.
The success of any nation is in the unity of its men, the support of its women, and the morality of its laws.
Without the brotherhood of men, we risk not fulfilling our duty to those significant values that we have learned underpin the ideological basis and success, not only of a sovereign nation but of any global civilisation we might hope for.
Ever wondered why you lost half your home, and all the items in it to a part-time girlfriend? Perhaps you lost the right to see your children? Maybe a huge weekly payment on top of that. Look no further than the idealogical people who get to decide how much to take away from you.
That Jacinda Adern on human rights for all speech did not include or give one iota of a mention towards men or boys.
Mothers protect your son’s wellbeing from this woman who has no intention to make his life safe or better.
In my view the Labour party’s approach to dad and male suicide is educate them before they reach their limit of brutality. Before they are pushed too far. What is wrong with “don’t be brutal to men and dads in the first place.”
I don’t know if the other parties are better for dads and men, but it is clear to me this party is not.
All these things that lead to male suicide are detailed in an open letter to the Humans Rights Commission by Mr Iain Fergusson.
Family First NZ says that if parents aren’t concerned about the conversion therapy bill introduced by the Government today, all they need to do is listen to the Minister of Justice explain the effect of the bill, and parents will quickly become very fearful.
In the rise and fall of civilisations, and there have been many over the last 12,000 years, there is a screed of comparable information against which we can judge our current environment.
In the sense of predicament though I think (more…)
NZ YouTuber takes a look at the heated debate around the validity of repressed and recovered memories. Includes rare footage of training videos teaching therapists to uncover Satanic cult abuse.
There is a misconception women are more heartbroken after divorce than men. The truth is the complete opposite.
Quote 10
“Emotionally, it was horrible. I lost not only my wife, I lost my lover, my best friend, my teammate, and my ‘family.’ To me, divorce just was never an option, until it happened. I felt lost. I had lost the one person who I felt I was allowed to confide in.” (more…)
Robert aged 55 said to his son. “The problems we have, and the trouble you are causing, will take its toll on you and the family … you are only making things worse.” (more…)
NZ's legislation and public policy is often influenced by advocacy research, which is designed to produce a pre-determined outcome. A classic example is the Hitting Home Report, winner of the 1995 NZ Skeptics Society ‘Bent Spoon Award'.
Nearly 30 years later, the committee declared the award was not justified, and appologised for “lack of critical thinking”.
NZ teacher Peter Joyce’s settled life was disrupted when a woman he had never met accused him of historic rape. With a unique brand of angry humour, his diary plots the stages of his despair and traces his attempts to find justice in the face of the current insistence that we must “believe the victim”.
Dry Ice is a compelling memoir, but much more. The accusation made the writer a reluctant expert on similar cases from all over the world. He throws light on everything that limits public knowledge of false sexual allegations, from dangerous counselling to flawed statistics, and he exposes police investigation methods as blinkered, inefficient and insensitive.